this is one of the first of my post of my new movie comparison series.....lemme tell u guys something...i dont sit n dwell on it..this come to me spontaneously coz of my love for movies...as i see a movie my mind automatically starts comparing if its s sequel or its based on a book or if its a remake...n if its none of the above..my mind starts working abt whats good in this movie (if its a nice movie)...or what sets it apart from the rest....n if its a bad movie..whats bad abt it...or wat can be done so that it cud be a better movie....this comes to me naturally.....n as it keeps on going round n round my head i have decided to pen in down (in this case type it down)
Dhoom Vs Dhoom 2
both these movies made good money...dhoom 2 more than dhoom....but as far as i m concerned...i believe dhoom was a much better movie than its sequel...
my reasons :dhoom.... it was a new concept...it was first of its kind....it practically had no stars...it made the actors stars..dhoom was abhisheks n john's first hit movie....good story good direction...nice action sequence..good songs...good comedy..loved uday chopra in the movie...comedy between rimi n uday too is nice....esha too looked nice...bike sequences were well shot...great dialogues....loved the conversations between john n abhishek...both on phone n in casino in end....abhishek actually does some policemangiri when he gets hold of bike...his role is not wasted in this movie...rimi sen too is good...i mean her role too is well done...all in all a well made movie
well dhoom 2 :GREAT star cast...HRITHIK ASH BIPASHA ABHISHEK UDAY CHOPRA....i did think wud any of these people been associated with dhoom 2 had the first movie not been a smashing hit
at the end of movie i wondered wat exactly was bipasha doing in the movie...we the movie wud have been same without her too..other than showing off her great body..she had no role....
hrithik did steal the show...with his brilliant dancing n acting...but u cant hang a guy for being so good than even the good appear mediocre...n another question popped up my head now...was there a show to steal
well there was nothing great in story...n it wasnt even as if it was one of the best perfomances by the rest of the cast...well they all have movies where they have acted wonderfully...i dont think dhoom 2 is gonna feature in hall of fame of any of the cast except HRITHIK....
ASH didnt get into the skin of the role she was enacting....my guess is she was supposed to get the LARA CROFT kind of a look...well she did try..her body language her running style etc did get close to it....but she didnt get thru it in her dialogue delivery....it was a different style..but she didnt sound the cool n rough n tough image she was trying to get...
abhishek....well m not comparing his dancing abilities or his physique with hrithik coz they jus cant be compared...but his role cud have been better as it was in dhoom 1....they cud have done something i m sure to make jai dixit appear formidable as against aryan...here there was no compitition...everyone knew jai was jus no match for MR A...
uday too sadly didnt carry his character well forward...
songs..pathetic..pl cant even listen to my name is ali and touch me dont touch me soniya.....
i dont know whom to fault....director or the actor....i asked myself is he the same guy who made dhoom...
action sequences are jus put for the heck of it....thanks to computers..most of the movie i guess is done on computer only....for no reason at all things r exploding...there r chases going on...well there should have been some continuity in action sequence...1 second u show hrithik going down the drain..n in next scene he comes out of fire hydrant ? were the drain n hydrant inter connected mr director...
on the plus side the title track n diljale rocked..but m afraid thats just thanks to hrithik..a sight for sore eyes in this movie
when u make dhoom 3 hope u make the movie comparable to your first if not better than that Mr Gadhvi
Comments